Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
82 Imaging
55 Features
30 Overall
45
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Launched February 2012
- Later Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Sigma. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and DP1 Merrill (15MP) and the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FH25 was launched 19 months prior to the DP1 Merrill which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-FH25 matches up versus the DP1 Merrill when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Sigma DP1 Merrill. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
| EX-FH25 | DP1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Casio EX-FH25
| DP1 Merrill | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 | July 2010 | Fresher by 19 months | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
| EX-FH25 | DP1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 has outside dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Sigma DP1 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the DP1 Merrill.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and DP1 Merrill is 69 and 82 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and DP1 Merrill.
As you have seen, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-FH25 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | - |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 pounds) | 330 gr (0.73 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $1,250 |