Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD10
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Bump to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched March 2004
- Succeeded the Sigma SD9
- Refreshed by Sigma SD14
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-FH25 and Sigma SD10, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH25 was brought out 6 years after the SD10 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-FH25 matches up versus the SD10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Sigma SD10. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Sigma SD10
| EX-FH25 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | March 2004 | More modern by 77 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 130k | Sharper display (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Casio EX-FH25
| SD10 | EX-FH25 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Sigma SD10
| EX-FH25 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH25 comes with exterior measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD10 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FH25 and Sigma SD10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH25 against the SD10.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and SD10 is 69 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes merely by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH25 and SD10.
Clearly, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-FH25 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Casio EX-FH25 will result in greater detail having its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-FH25 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Sigma SD10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2010-07-06 | 2004-03-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 lb) | 950g (2.09 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $450 | $198 |