Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony H300
Portability
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
Portability
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony H300 Key Specs
Casio EX-FH25
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Revealed July 2010
Sony H300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Released February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony H300 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Casio EX-FH25 and Sony H300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Sony. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and H300 (20MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FH25 was revealed 4 years earlier than the H300 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-FH25 scores versus the H300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony H300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Sony H300
| EX-FH25 | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Casio EX-FH25
| H300 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Sony H300
| EX-FH25 | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 has got exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Sony H300 has measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") along with a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FH25 and Sony H300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the H300.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and H300 is 69 and 63 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and H300.
As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Sony H300 to result in extra detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 Portrait photography factors
Sony H300 Portrait photography factors
manual focus
supports RAW files
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-FH25
Street photography with Sony H300
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (524g)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than average (590g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-FH25
Sports photography with Sony H300
long zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
fast continuous shooting (40.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
great zoom range (25-875mm 35.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
includes tracking focus
better than average battery power (350 shots)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 Travel photography features
Sony H300 Travel photography features
flash built-in
rather wide (26mm)
great zoom (520mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (524 grams)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
better than average battery power (350 shots)
MP count decent (20MP)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
very long reach (875mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than average (590g)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 Landscape photography details
Sony H300 Landscape photography details
manual focus
rather wide (26mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse mode
really wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
better than average battery power (350 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 Vlogging advice
Sony H300 Vlogging advice
rather wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (524g)
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic jack
heavier than average (590g)
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony H300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dot |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | 8.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 lb) | 590g (1.30 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $450 | $249 |