Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony W320
69 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
97 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony W320 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony W320, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and W320 (14MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FH25 was released 6 months after the W320 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-FH25 scores versus the W320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Sony W320
| EX-FH25 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Casio EX-FH25
| W320 | EX-FH25 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Sony W320
| EX-FH25 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2010 |  | January 2010 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 enjoys exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Sony W320 has measurements of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") along with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony W320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the W320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and W320 is 69 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching specs. The pic underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and W320.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Sony W320 to result in extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony W320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-07-06 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 lb) | 117g (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $450 | $269 |
