Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-ZR10
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-ZR10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Launched September 2010
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-ZR10 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Casio EX-FS10 versus Casio EX-ZR10, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are created by Casio. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and EX-ZR10 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FS10 was manufactured 20 months before the EX-ZR10 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR10 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-FS10 matches up vs the EX-ZR10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR10. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Casio EX-ZR10
EX-FS10 | EX-ZR10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Casio EX-FS10
EX-ZR10 | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2010 | January 2009 | Fresher by 20 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Casio EX-ZR10
EX-FS10 | EX-ZR10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-ZR10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-FS10 has external measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Casio EX-ZR10 has specifications of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FS10 versus Casio EX-ZR10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-FS10 and the EX-ZR10.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and EX-ZR10 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-ZR10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and EX-ZR10.
Clearly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR10 to result in extra detail due to its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-ZR10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-ZR10 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Casio |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2010-09-20 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Exilim Engine HS |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) | 176 gr (0.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | NP-110 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $200 | $190 |