Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
96 Imaging
31 Features
18 Overall
25
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed April 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Following is a complete review of the Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and FujiFilm. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") offer different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FS10 was revealed 3 months prior to the Fujifilm F200EXR and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-FS10 matches up versus the Fujifilm F200EXR with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| EX-FS10 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-FS10
| Fujifilm F200EXR | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Fujifilm F200EXR
| EX-FS10 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2009 |  | April 2009 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 has external dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Fujifilm F200EXR has dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the Fujifilm F200EXR.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by reviewing specs. The picture here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FS10 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-FS10 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Fujifilm F200EXR will deliver greater detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2009-04-30 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.3-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $350 |