Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Casio EX-FS10 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) is fairly similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FS10 was launched 6 months prior to the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| EX-FS10 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Casio EX-FS10
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 2.8" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| EX-FS10 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2009 |  | July 2009 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 has got outside dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has dimensions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") along with a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FS10 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over specs. The photograph below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 to offer greater detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | RP (Real Photo) 3D |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 8cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 2.8" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 1/4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/1000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.60 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 260 grams (0.57 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | NP-95 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $200 | $900 |