Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-25
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
98 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Announced March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-25 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-25, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and FE-25 (10MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and FE-25 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-330 was manufactured 3 years before the FE-25 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-330 matches up versus the FE-25 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-25 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 and Olympus FE-25. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Olympus FE-25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus FE-25
| E-330 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 2.5" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.1") |
| Display resolution | 215k |  | 112k | Crisper display (+103k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Olympus E-330
| FE-25 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2009 |  | March 2006 | Newer by 34 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus FE-25
| E-330 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-25 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 features physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus FE-25 has dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-25 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-330 against the FE-25.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and FE-25 is 65 and 98 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-25 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by checking out a spec sheet. The picture here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and FE-25.
Clearly, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus FE-25 will produce more detail due to its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-25 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-25 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Olympus FE-25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Olympus FE-25 |
| Other name | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2006-03-18 | 2009-01-07 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Max resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 3648 x 2768 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | - |
| Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | () |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.4 inch |
| Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 112 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | None |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616g (1.36 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $1,100 | $15 |