Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
![Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10/Casio-EX-FS10-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S80 front Nikon Coolpix S80 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S80/Nikon-S80-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 133g - 99 x 63 x 17mm
- Introduced September 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Casio EX-FS10 and Nikon S80, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Nikon. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and S80 (14MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The EX-FS10 was released 20 months prior to the S80 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-FS10 grades versus the S80 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Nikon Coolpix S80. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Nikon S80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Nikon S80
EX-FS10 | S80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S80 over the Casio EX-FS10
S80 | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 20 months |
Display sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") |
Display resolution | 819k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+589k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Nikon S80
EX-FS10 | S80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FS10 comes with outside measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Nikon S80 has sizing of 99mm x 63mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.7") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FS10 and Nikon S80 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the S80.
![Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S80-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and S80 is 96 and 96 respectively.
![Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S80-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and S80.
As you can tell, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Nikon S80 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S80-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S80-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S80 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Nikon Coolpix S80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Nikon Coolpix S80 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2010-09-08 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.6-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 7cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 819k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.3 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) | 133 gr (0.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 99 x 63 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | EN-EL10 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $200 | $191 |