Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZR1
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Revealed March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Old Model is Olympus E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-ZX1
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZR1, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and ZR1 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and ZR1 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-330 was announced 4 years before the ZR1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZR1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short view of how the E-330 grades against the ZR1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic ZR1
| E-330 | ZR1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus E-330
| ZR1 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 |  | March 2006 | Newer by 40 months |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic ZR1
| E-330 | ZR1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 offers exterior measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZR1 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZR1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-330 against the ZR1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and ZR1 is 65 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and ZR1.
As you can see, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic ZR1 will result in extra detail with its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
| Also referred to as | EVOLT E-330 | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2006-03-18 | 2009-07-27 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 215k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616g (1.36 pounds) | 158g (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $1,100 | $280 |