Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus 5010
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Other Name is mju 5010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus 5010 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus 5010, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and 5010 (14MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FS10 was manufactured 12 months prior to the 5010 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-FS10 scores versus the 5010 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus 5010 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Olympus Stylus 5010. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Olympus 5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Olympus 5010
| EX-FS10 | 5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Casio EX-FS10
| 5010 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 12 months |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Olympus 5010
| EX-FS10 | 5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FS10 has external dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus 5010 has measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus 5010 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-FS10 and the 5010.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FS10 and 5010 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes just by going through specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FS10 and 5010.
All in all, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus 5010 to produce extra detail due to its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus 5010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Olympus Stylus 5010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Olympus Stylus 5010 |
| Also called | - | mju 5010 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lb) | 126 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $200 | $150 |
