Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus TG-870
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FS10 was manufactured 8 years prior to the TG-870 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-FS10 matches up against the TG-870 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Olympus TG-870
| EX-FS10 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Casio EX-FS10
| TG-870 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2016 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 85 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Olympus TG-870
| EX-FS10 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FS10 enjoys outer dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has sizing of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus TG-870 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the TG-870.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and TG-870 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FS10 and TG-870.
To sum up, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus TG-870 to give more detail due to its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-FS10 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2016-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 221 grams (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-80 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $200 | $280 |