Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX1
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh CX1, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is pretty close and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FS10 was introduced at a similar time to the CX1 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-FS10 matches up versus the CX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Ricoh CX1
| EX-FS10 | CX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Casio EX-FS10
| CX1 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh CX1
| EX-FS10 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2009 |  | February 2009 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FS10 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh CX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the CX1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FS10 and CX1 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing specifications. The pic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FS10 and CX1.
To sum up, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of photos but you should really consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-02-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 180 grams (0.40 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $200 | $299 |
