Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Following is a complete assessment of the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") provide different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-FS10 was launched 6 months prior to the GR Digital III so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-FS10 grades against the GR Digital III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 EX-FS10 GR Digital III 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Casio EX-FS10

 GR Digital III EX-FS10 
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh GR Digital III

 EX-FS10 GR Digital III 
IntroducedJanuary 2009July 2009Same generation
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-FS10 enjoys exterior dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

See the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh GR Digital III in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FS10 vs the GR Digital III.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and GR Digital III is 96 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FS10 and GR Digital III.

As you can tell, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-FS10 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GR Digital III will show greater detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Portrait photography features
Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography features
25
focusing manually
no manual control
no external flash support
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
40
you can focus manually
exports RAW formats
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Street photography camera
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
55
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Sports photography information
Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography information
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,250s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
17
fixed focal length (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Travel photography camera
51
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
resolution not great (9MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
63
built-in flash
good max aperture (f1.9)
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Landscape photography info
Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography info
26
focusing manually
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.5")
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
45
you can focus manually
good max aperture (f1.9)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
exports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Vlogging information
Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging information
22
wide angle not the best (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone jack
25
good max aperture (f1.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Brand Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Ricoh GR Digital III
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2009-07-27
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 3456 x 2592 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 38-114mm (3.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.9-7.1 f/1.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 secs 1 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1250 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 3.00 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 121g (0.27 lb) 208g (0.46 lb)
Physical dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-80 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $200 $399