Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FS10 was launched 10 months before the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-FS10 grades against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| EX-FS10 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-FS10
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2009 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 10 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| EX-FS10 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FS10 has got outer dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FS10 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 96 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The pic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
All in all, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-FS10 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-11-10 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/2.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) | 453 grams (1.00 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $566 |