Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh PX
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Announced August 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh PX Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh PX, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and PX (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FS10 was launched 3 years before the PX and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-FS10 matches up versus the PX for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Ricoh PX. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Ricoh PX
| EX-FS10 | PX |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Casio EX-FS10
| PX | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 31 months |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh PX
| EX-FS10 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 has external measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh PX has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh PX in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-FS10 vs the PX.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and PX is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and PX.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh PX to result in greater detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh PX |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) | 156 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $329 |