Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c093a/c093ae2117bb68c7c1561b0f622d9b6a9250e7ec" alt="Olympus SZ-10 front Olympus SZ-10 front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched February 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus SZ-10, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and SZ-10 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and SZ-10 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-520 was brought out 3 years earlier than the SZ-10 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-520 matches up against the SZ-10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 and Olympus SZ-10. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Olympus SZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus SZ-10
E-520 | SZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Olympus E-520
SZ-10 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | ![]() | August 2008 | Fresher by 30 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus SZ-10
E-520 | SZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 features physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-10 has specifications of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus SZ-10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-520 against the SZ-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5b13/b5b13b0f92946dd7537f875a0aabddb7ee31908c" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and SZ-10 is 68 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4bab/b4bab3e60f899d4ba1b86e96663a3d06afcf3c94" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and SZ-10.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-520 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus SZ-10 will provide extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-520 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51d10/51d10ded8b61601b0c6253e703a6675980eb09d6" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70c07/70c0759faf0b9fb3dce7721d079ddf96f1b03624" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SZ-10 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus SZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus SZ-10 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-4.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lbs) | 215 grams (0.47 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 images | 220 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $400 | $300 |