Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F
96 Imaging
31 Features
18 Overall
25
90 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Casio EX-FS10 versus Samsung EX2F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FS10 was unveiled 4 years prior to the EX2F and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the EX2F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung EX2F
| EX-FS10 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Casio EX-FS10
| EX2F | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2012 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 48 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung EX2F
| EX-FS10 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FS10 offers outside measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has sizing of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FS10 versus Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FS10 against the EX2F.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and EX2F is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The graphic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and EX2F.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-FS10 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Samsung EX2F will give you extra detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung EX2F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) | 294 gr (0.65 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $200 | $478 |