Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Casio EX-FS10 versus Samsung EX2F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FS10 was unveiled 4 years prior to the EX2F and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the EX2F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung EX2F
| EX-FS10 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Casio EX-FS10
| EX2F | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2012 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 48 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung EX2F
| EX-FS10 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FS10 offers outside measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has sizing of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FS10 versus Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FS10 against the EX2F.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and EX2F is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The graphic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and EX2F.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-FS10 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Samsung EX2F will give you extra detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung EX2F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) | 294 gr (0.65 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $200 | $478 |