Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74ffb/74ffb1851885b9e3957d5f8590417174f0eb5bfe" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 163g - 98 x 55 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic FH1, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the FH1 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and FH1 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-620 was launched 6 months before the FH1 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-620 grades vs the FH1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-620 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Panasonic FH1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic FH1
E-620 | FH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH1 over the Olympus E-620
FH1 | E-620 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FH1
E-620 | FH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2010 | Same generation |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 provides outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH1 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic FH1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-620 against the FH1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9dc91/9dc91dfff1c398c22868be6b8333920b0ea67581" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and FH1 is 71 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d3f3/4d3f358c55c56187d1ec9dccf06e841df2a5ea15" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and FH1.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have the same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The E-620 offers the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallower DOF easier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b842/6b842353a59a4450efd50545ad3afefbefeb55bd" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/413b6/413b67d3b072394bb605c8ffe61e9b8dd64aab44" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH1 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FS10 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 6.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 pounds) | 163 gr (0.36 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 98 x 55 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $799 | $150 |