Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa019/fa0193b60bb5af18fb50aecee2d917106dd57089" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4adb4/4adb4c1935c2b34521695695a5f59e7ed6c45a23" alt="Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G front Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G front"
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The EX-FS10 was revealed 4 years before the Galaxy Camera 3G which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-FS10 grades against the Galaxy Camera 3G with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
EX-FS10 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Casio EX-FS10
Galaxy Camera 3G | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 44 months |
Display size | 4.8" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+2.3") |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
EX-FS10 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 has exterior dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FS10 against the Galaxy Camera 3G.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1097/b1097ca781d0ef4e860542b6653d4463804beb33" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and Galaxy Camera 3G is 96 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6509b/6509b506a9c72896c0d4327a543e7ed0e690893f" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading technical specs. The image below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FS10 and Galaxy Camera 3G.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to offer more detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca8a8/ca8a8f5f5628833d2e8c8887a889cf9209c0c893" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G sensor size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93ee8/93ee8f56472e9c1b22b9e4dca9c3f13e8deec5c3" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-08-29 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | - |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lb) | 305 gr (0.67 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $200 | $606 |