Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST150F
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Released January 2013
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung ST150F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and ST150F (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FS10 was released 5 years prior to the ST150F which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung ST150F being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-FS10 matches up against the ST150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Samsung ST150F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung ST150F
EX-FS10 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Casio EX-FS10
ST150F | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung ST150F
EX-FS10 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 enjoys outer dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST150F has dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung ST150F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-FS10 vs the ST150F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and ST150F is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The image here might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FS10 and ST150F.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung ST150F to give more detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung ST150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung ST150F |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 114 grams (0.25 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $200 | $300 |