Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS15
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 136g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS15 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS15, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the FS15 (12MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 9000 was manufactured 4 months after the FS15 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS15 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple view of how the 9000 grades vs the FS15 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS15 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic FS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FS15
9000 | FS15 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS15 over the Olympus 9000
FS15 | 9000 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FS15
9000 | FS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2009 | January 2009 | Similar age | |
Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS15 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 has got exterior measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Panasonic FS15 has specifications of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS15 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the 9000 compared to the FS15.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and FS15 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS15 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through a spec sheet. The image underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and FS15.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs however you should always factor the launch date of the products into consideration.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS15 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 |
Also referred to as | mju 9000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2009-01-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 lb) | 136g (0.30 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $300 | $180 |