Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST65

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Announced January 2009
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST65 Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and ST65 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The EX-FS10 was unveiled 24 months prior to the ST65 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-FS10 matches up against the ST65 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung ST65

 EX-FS10 ST65 
Manual focus More exact focus

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio EX-FS10

 ST65 EX-FS10 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011January 2009Newer by 24 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung ST65

 EX-FS10 ST65 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FS10 provides exterior measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung ST65 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST65 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FS10 and the ST65.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and ST65 is 96 and 99 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The picture underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and ST65.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung ST65 to result in extra detail having an extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Portrait photography details
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography details
25
you can focus manually
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
MP count low (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
28
MP count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Street photography factors
Samsung ST65 Street photography factors
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
49
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
max ISO too low (0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Sports photography camera
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,250 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
26
MP count good (14 megapixels)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Travel photography features
Samsung ST65 Travel photography features
51
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
MP count low (9MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
71
MP count good (14MP)
has built in flash
good max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-FS10
Landscape photography with Samsung ST65
26
you can focus manually
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.5")
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
does not have Timelapse mode
37
good max aperture (f)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
MP count good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-FS10
Vlogging with Samsung ST65
22
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone jack
27
good max aperture (f)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung ST65
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Samsung ST65
General Information
Brand Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Samsung ST65
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-01-08 2011-01-19
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 3456 x 2592 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 -
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 38-114mm (3.0x) ()
Largest aperture f/3.9-7.1 -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1250 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 121 gr (0.27 pounds) -
Physical dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-80 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible -
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $200 $130