Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB750
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Released September 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB750, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and WB750 (13MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FS10 was announced 3 years earlier than the WB750 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-FS10 scores versus the WB750 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Samsung WB750. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung WB750
| EX-FS10 | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Casio EX-FS10
| WB750 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 32 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB750
| EX-FS10 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-FS10 features exterior measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB750 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FS10 compared to the WB750.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and WB750 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and WB750.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Samsung WB750 to give you more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung WB750 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 13MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | - | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $200 | $339 |