Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony TX1
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Released August 2009
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony TX1 Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-FS10 versus Sony TX1, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and the TX1 (10MP) is relatively similar but the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") provide different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FS10 was manufactured 7 months before the TX1 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the TX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Sony TX1
EX-FS10 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Casio EX-FS10
TX1 | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2009 | January 2009 | More recent by 7 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Sony TX1
EX-FS10 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FS10 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony TX1 has measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FS10 versus Sony TX1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-FS10 and the TX1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and TX1 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and TX1.
As you can see, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-FS10 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Sony TX1 will offer you greater detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 8cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/1250s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121g (0.27 pounds) | 142g (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $200 | $350 |