Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M381
Portability
94 Imaging
34 Features
16 Overall
26
94 Imaging
34 Features
16 Overall
26
Portability
95 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
95 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M381 Key Specs
Casio EX-G1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Introduced November 2009
Kodak M381
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
- Launched July 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M381 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Casio EX-G1 versus Kodak M381, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-G1 (12MP) and the M381 (12MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-G1 was launched 4 months later than the M381 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-G1 scores versus the M381 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M381 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Kodak EasyShare M381. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Kodak M381 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Kodak M381
| EX-G1 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Casio EX-G1
| M381 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Kodak M381
| EX-G1 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2009 |  | July 2009 | Similar generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M381 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-G1 features outside measurements of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") and a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Kodak M381 has sizing of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-G1 versus Kodak M381 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-G1 and the M381.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-G1 and M381 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M381 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by checking a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-G1 and M381.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution so you should expect similar quality of photos though you should factor the release date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M381 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-G1 Portrait photography features
Kodak M381 Portrait photography features
you can focus manually
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-G1 Street photography information
Kodak M381 Street photography information
environment proof
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (154g)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than others in class (153 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Casio EX-G1 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak M381 as a Sports photography camera
environment proof
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,250s)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Casio EX-G1 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak M381 as a Travel photography camera
environment proof
has built in flash
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (154g)
megapixel count low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (153g)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-G1 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak M381 as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
environment proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.5 inches)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Timelapse mode
nice screen size (3")
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-G1
Vlogging with Kodak M381
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (154g)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external mic support
heavier than others in class (153g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M381 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Kodak EasyShare M381 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Kodak EasyShare M381 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-11-18 | 2009-07-29 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.0-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154 grams (0.34 pounds) | 153 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-800 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $61 | $170 |