Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Released February 2012
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the EX-G1 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-G1 was unveiled 3 years before the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-G1 grades vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-G1 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-G1
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | EX-G1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | November 2009 | Newer by 26 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-G1 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-G1 comes with external dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") and a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has proportions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-G1 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-G1 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 94 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specifications. The picture underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-G1 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
To sum up, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-G1 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will render extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-11-18 | 2012-02-02 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.40 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 154 gr (0.34 lb) | 550 gr (1.21 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-800 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $61 | $871 |