Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d72ba/d72baa7e900476652f0268975a9eaa6179bd2401" alt="Casio Exilim EX-G1 front Casio Exilim EX-G1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3208c/3208cbdbdd11e23eae5a341ac80491dad70aec44" alt="Samsung TL500 front Samsung TL500 front"
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Released July 2010
- Additionally Known as EX1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung TL500, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-G1 (12MP) and the TL500 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-G1 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-G1 was launched 7 months earlier than the TL500 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-G1 grades versus the TL500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Samsung TL500. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung TL500
EX-G1 | TL500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Casio EX-G1
TL500 | EX-G1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2010 | ![]() | November 2009 | More recent by 7 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung TL500
EX-G1 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-G1 features exterior dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") along with a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL500 has proportions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung TL500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-G1 versus the TL500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17b0b/17b0b9683e8cc748bb0feda67556a23180f14bcb" alt="Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 size comparison Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-G1 and TL500 is 94 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac1e1/ac1e189fb4eb1c74af0c8c14156d555f08ca9d21" alt="Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The graphic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-G1 and TL500.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-G1 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-G1 will give you more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-G1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51a56/51a565bf712f7800e242f427bd65fd62fbb419df" alt="Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcab1/dcab1a35389eb98c518f3f2416dc679ce551b1b1" alt="Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung TL500 |
Also Known as | - | EX1 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-11-18 | 2010-07-09 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.40 m | 5.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 154g (0.34 pounds) | 386g (0.85 pounds) |
Dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-800 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $61 | $527 |