Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX30
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
91 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Launched September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX30 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus VG-160 and Sony QX30, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Lens-style by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and QX30 (20MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VG-160 was brought out 3 years before the QX30 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the VG-160 matches up vs the QX30 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX30 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-160 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Sony QX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony QX30
| VG-160 | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | " | Larger display (+3") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Olympus VG-160
| QX30 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 32 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony QX30
| VG-160 | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-160 has physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony QX30 has proportions of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VG-160 and Sony QX30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the VG-160 versus the QX30.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and QX30 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to see the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through specifications. The photograph here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-160 and QX30.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony QX30 to provide you with greater detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older VG-160 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX30 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2014-09-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | - |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 pictures | 200 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $90 | $348 |