Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB50F
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Announced January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung WB50F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-G1 was revealed 5 years before the WB50F which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-G1 scores vs the WB50F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Samsung WB50F. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung WB50F
| EX-G1 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-G1
| WB50F | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | November 2009 | More modern by 50 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung WB50F
| EX-G1 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-G1 has got exterior dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") having a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung WB50F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-G1 versus the WB50F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-G1 and WB50F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by reviewing technical specs. The pic here should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-G1 and WB50F.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB50F to deliver extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB50F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-11-18 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250s | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154 gr (0.34 lb) | 207 gr (0.46 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-800 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $61 | $180 |