Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-G1 was announced 4 years earlier than the WB800F which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-G1 matches up against the WB800F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-G1 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-G1 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-G1 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-G1
| WB800F | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | November 2009 | More modern by 38 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung WB800F
| EX-G1 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-G1 provides exterior dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") having a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-G1 compared to the WB800F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-G1 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The pic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-G1 and WB800F.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB800F to offer extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-11-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154 grams (0.34 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-800 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $61 | $300 |
