Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F
94 Imaging
34 Features
16 Overall
26
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-G1 was announced 4 years earlier than the WB800F which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-G1 matches up against the WB800F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-G1 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-G1 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-G1 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-G1
| WB800F | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | November 2009 | More modern by 38 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung WB800F
| EX-G1 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-G1 provides exterior dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") having a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-G1 compared to the WB800F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-G1 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The pic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-G1 and WB800F.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB800F to offer extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-11-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154 grams (0.34 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-800 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $61 | $300 |