Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS40
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
90 Imaging
43 Features
58 Overall
49
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS40 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 240g - 111 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced January 2014
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ60
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS35
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS45
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS40 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS40, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and ZS40 (18MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and ZS40 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-3 was released 6 years earlier than the ZS40 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS40 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-3 grades against the ZS40 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS40 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Panasonic ZS40 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic ZS40
E-3 | ZS40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS40 over the Olympus E-3
ZS40 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | February 2008 | Newer by 71 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZS40
E-3 | ZS40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS40 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 offers outside measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS40 has specifications of 111mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 240 grams (0.53 lbs).
See the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS40 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-3 compared to the ZS40.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and ZS40 is 56 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS40 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and ZS40.
As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZS40 will show greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS40 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS40 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ60 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2008-02-20 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 6.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 pounds) | 240g (0.53 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 111 x 64 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $670 | $450 |