Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR400
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Casio EX-H10 versus Casio EX-ZR400, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Casio. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and EX-ZR400 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H10 was announced 4 years earlier than the EX-ZR400 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-H10 scores against the EX-ZR400 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR400. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| EX-H10 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Casio EX-H10
| EX-ZR400 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | June 2009 | More recent by 44 months |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Casio EX-ZR400
| EX-H10 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H10 offers outer measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-ZR400 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H10 versus Casio EX-ZR400 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-H10 versus the EX-ZR400.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and EX-ZR400 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and EX-ZR400.
Clearly, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to result in greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Casio |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2013-01-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 30.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $0 |