Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Launched August 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) is pretty close and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H10 was released 14 months earlier than the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-H10 grades against the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| EX-H10 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Casio EX-H10
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2010 |  | June 2009 | More modern by 14 months |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| EX-H10 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 has got outside dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-H10 vs the Fujifilm Real 3D W3.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to see the gap in sensor sizes just by researching technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3.
As you can tell, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-H10 to render greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-06-11 | 2010-08-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,150 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 3.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $900 |