Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
![Olympus E-1 front Olympus E-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Olympus-E-1-ek-fs.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-9000/Olympus-9000-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Released November 2003
- Later Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-1 and Olympus 9000, one being a Pro DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and 9000 (12MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and 9000 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The E-1 was announced 6 years earlier than the 9000 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-1 scores against the 9000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-1 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus 9000
E-1 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus E-1
9000 | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2009 | ![]() | November 2003 | Fresher by 66 months |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus 9000
E-1 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-1 comes with exterior measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-1 and Olympus 9000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-1 vs the 9000.
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-Stylus-9000-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-1 and 9000 is 59 and 92 respectively.
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-Stylus-9000-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-1 and 9000.
As you can see, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-1 using its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus 9000 will provide more detail with its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older E-1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-Stylus-9000-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-Stylus-9000-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-1 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also called | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2003-11-29 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 735 gr (1.62 lb) | 225 gr (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $300 |