Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Released November 2003
- Later Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-1 and Olympus 9000, one being a Pro DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and 9000 (12MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and 9000 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-1 was announced 6 years earlier than the 9000 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-1 scores against the 9000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-1 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus 9000
E-1 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus E-1
9000 | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2009 | November 2003 | Fresher by 66 months | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus 9000
E-1 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-1 comes with exterior measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-1 and Olympus 9000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-1 vs the 9000.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-1 and 9000 is 59 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-1 and 9000.
As you can see, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-1 using its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus 9000 will provide more detail with its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older E-1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-1 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also called | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2003-11-29 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 735 gr (1.62 lb) | 225 gr (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $300 |