Clicky

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S8200

Portability
93
Imaging
34
Features
25
Overall
30
Casio Exilim EX-H10 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S8200 front
Portability
61
Imaging
39
Features
42
Overall
40

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S8200 Key Specs

Casio EX-H10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
  • Released June 2009
Fujifilm S8200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S8200 Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Casio EX-H10 versus Fujifilm S8200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and FujiFilm. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-H10 was released 4 years prior to the Fujifilm S8200 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-H10 grades versus the Fujifilm S8200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Fujifilm S8200

 EX-H10 Fujifilm S8200 

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Casio EX-H10

 Fujifilm S8200 EX-H10 
LaunchedJanuary 2013June 2009Newer by 43 months
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Fujifilm S8200

 EX-H10 Fujifilm S8200 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S8200 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S8200 has measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).

Examine the Casio EX-H10 versus Fujifilm S8200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H10 and the Fujifilm S8200.

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S8200 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and Fujifilm S8200 is 93 and 61 respectively.

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S8200 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S8200 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The picture here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and Fujifilm S8200.

All in all, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S8200 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S8200 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S8200 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S8200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Portrait photography info
Fujifilm S8200 Portrait photography info
27
focusing manually
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
39
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-H10
Street photography with Fujifilm S8200
56
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
41
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than competition (670g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Sports photography highlights
Fujifilm S8200 Sports photography highlights
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low frames per second (4.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
49
long zoom range (24-960mm 40.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Travel photography factors
Fujifilm S8200 Travel photography factors
57
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
low resolution (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
52
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (960mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (670g)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Landscape photography advice
Fujifilm S8200 Landscape photography advice
41
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
no manual mode
low resolution (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
46
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Vlogging advice
Fujifilm S8200 Vlogging advice
28
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic socket
24
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (670g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S8200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H10 and Fujifilm S8200
 Casio Exilim EX-H10Fujifilm FinePix S8200
General Information
Brand Name Casio FujiFilm
Model Casio Exilim EX-H10 Fujifilm FinePix S8200
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-06-11 2013-01-07
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 12800
Min native ISO 64 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 24-960mm (40.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus distance 7cm 0cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech - TFT color LCD monitor
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200 thousand dot
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1700 secs
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.60 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194 grams (0.43 lb) 670 grams (1.48 lb)
Physical dimensions 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-90 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $300 $450