Clicky

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak M340

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim EX-H10 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak M340 Key Specs

Casio EX-H10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
  • Introduced June 2009
Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak M340 Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Casio EX-H10 and Kodak M340, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the M340 (10MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The EX-H10 was introduced 6 months later than the M340 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Kodak M340 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-H10 scores vs the M340 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Kodak M340

 EX-H10 M340 
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Casio EX-H10

 M340 EX-H10 

Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Kodak M340

 EX-H10 M340 
IntroducedJune 2009January 2009Same generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 has got exterior measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Kodak M340 has dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-H10 and Kodak M340 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H10 compared to the M340.

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak M340 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and M340 is 93 and 96 respectively.

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak M340 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and M340.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Casio EX-H10 to provide you with more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively.

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak M340 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak M340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Portrait photography features
Kodak M340 Portrait photography features
27
focusing manually
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Street photography info
Kodak M340 Street photography info
56
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
47
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Sports photography information
Kodak M340 Sports photography information
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max fps low (4.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Travel photography info
Kodak M340 Travel photography info
57
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
missing Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
51
has built in flash
missing Timelapse function
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H10 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak M340 as a Landscape photography camera
41
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
manual exposure not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
22
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-H10
Vlogging with Kodak M340
28
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone support
22
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak M340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H10 and Kodak M340
 Casio Exilim EX-H10Kodak EasyShare M340
General Information
Company Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim EX-H10 Kodak EasyShare M340
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-06-11 2009-01-05
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 3664 x 2748
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 64
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 5
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/3.1-5.7
Macro focusing distance 7cm 7cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.60 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 194 grams (0.43 pounds) 115 grams (0.25 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-90 KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $300 $130