Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Z981
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Z981 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Announced July 2010
Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Z981 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Z981, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the Z981 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H10 was brought out 13 months before the Z981 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Kodak Z981 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-H10 scores against the Z981 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Z981 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Kodak EasyShare Z981. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Kodak Z981 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Kodak Z981
EX-H10 | Z981 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | 201k | Clearer screen (+29k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Casio EX-H10
Z981 | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | June 2009 | More recent by 13 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Kodak Z981
EX-H10 | Z981 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Z981 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-H10 offers outer dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z981 has specifications of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Z981 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H10 versus the Z981.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and Z981 is 93 and 66 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Z981 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and Z981.
As you can see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Kodak Z981 to produce greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Z981 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Z981 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Kodak EasyShare Z981 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 201k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 6.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) | 540 gr (1.19 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $300 | $299 |