Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon W300
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon W300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2017
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon W300 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon W300, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Nikon. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and W300 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-H10 was revealed 9 years earlier than the W300 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-H10 scores versus the W300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon W300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Nikon Coolpix W300. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Nikon W300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Nikon W300
| EX-H10 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Casio EX-H10
| W300 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | June 2009 | More modern by 97 months |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Nikon W300
| EX-H10 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon W300 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys exterior measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Nikon W300 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon W300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H10 vs the W300.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and W300 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon W300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor sizes just by going through technical specs. The picture here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and W300.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Nikon W300 to produce greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon W300 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon W300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Nikon Coolpix W300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Nikon Coolpix W300 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-06-11 | 2017-05-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) | 231 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 280 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Built-in |
| Battery model | NP-90 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $387 |