Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-4000
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-H10 versus Olympus FE-4000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the FE-4000 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H10 was manufactured about the same time to the FE-4000 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-H10 scores vs the FE-4000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Olympus FE-4000. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus FE-4000
| EX-H10 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Casio EX-H10
| FE-4000 | EX-H10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus FE-4000
| EX-H10 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2009 |  | July 2009 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H10 has got exterior measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-4000 has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H10 versus Olympus FE-4000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H10 vs the FE-4000.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and FE-4000 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specifications. The image here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and FE-4000.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of photos however you would want to factor the release date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus FE-4000 |
| Otherwise known as | - | X-925 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-06-11 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 136 grams (0.30 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $130 |