Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-6
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
90 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-5
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-6 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus TG-6, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the TG-6 (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TG-6 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-400 was launched 13 years prior to the TG-6 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-400 scores vs the TG-6 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-6 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Olympus Tough TG-6. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus TG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus TG-6
| E-400 | TG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus E-400
| TG-6 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2019 | September 2006 | More recent by 154 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 215k | Sharper screen (+825k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-6
| E-400 | TG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-6 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 enjoys exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus TG-6 has dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus TG-6 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-400 versus the TG-6.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and TG-6 is 77 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-6 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading specs. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and TG-6.
All in all, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-400 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus TG-6 will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Olympus Tough TG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus Tough TG-6 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2019-05-22 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 20.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC |
| Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lbs) | 253 gr (0.56 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $599 | $449 |