Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 6020
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus 6020, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the 6020 (13MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H10 was brought out 7 months before the 6020 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-H10 grades versus the 6020 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus 6020
| EX-H10 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Casio EX-H10
| 6020 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2010 | June 2009 | More modern by 7 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus 6020
| EX-H10 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H10 features external measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus 6020 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-H10 compared to the 6020.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and 6020 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through specs. The image here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and 6020.
All in all, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus 6020 to render extra detail having its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also Known as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-06-11 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 13MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 122 gr (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $279 |