Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-310
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-310, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H10 was revealed 19 months before the TG-310 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-H10 scores versus the TG-310 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Olympus TG-310. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus TG-310
| EX-H10 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Casio EX-H10
| TG-310 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | June 2009 | Fresher by 19 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-310
| EX-H10 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 features outer measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-H10 compared to the TG-310.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and TG-310 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by looking at specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and TG-310.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-310 to give you greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-06-11 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $0 |