Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-330
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus VR-330, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H10 was manufactured 20 months earlier than the VR-330 making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-H10 scores vs the VR-330 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Olympus VR-330. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus VR-330
| EX-H10 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-H10
| VR-330 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2011 |  | June 2009 | Newer by 20 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus VR-330
| EX-H10 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-H10 provides external measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-H10 and the VR-330.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and VR-330 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and VR-330.
Clearly, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus VR-330 to offer greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $220 |