Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus FE-5020

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Olympus FE-5020 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Replacement is Olympus E-510
Olympus FE-5020
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Additionally referred to as X-935
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview

The following is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus FE-5020, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FE-5020 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FE-5020 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-500 was launched 4 years earlier than the FE-5020 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-500 scores against the FE-5020 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus FE-5020

 E-500 FE-5020 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus E-500

 FE-5020 E-500 
AnnouncedJuly 2009October 2005Newer by 45 months
Display dimension2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kClearer display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus FE-5020

 E-500 FE-5020 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Olympus FE-5020 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus FE-5020 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-500 against the FE-5020.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus FE-5020 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and FE-5020 is 70 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus FE-5020 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing technical specs. The picture below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and FE-5020.

As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus FE-5020 will provide more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus FE-5020 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography features
Olympus FE-5020 Portrait photography features
49
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
resolution not great (8MP)
21
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography features
Olympus FE-5020 Street photography features
57
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than others (479 grams)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
60
weather proofing
lighter than competitors (137 grams)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus FE-5020 as a Sports photography camera
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (8MP)
24
weather proofing
low maximum shutter speed (1/500s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography factors
Olympus FE-5020 Travel photography factors
52
lighter than others (479g)
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse function
resolution not great (8MP)
does not feature selfie friendly display
65
lighter than competitors (137 grams)
weather proofing
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
MP count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus FE-5020 Landscape photography highlights
43
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Time Lapse function
31
pretty wide (24mm)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus FE-5020 as a Vlogging camera
9
lack of video recording
28
pretty wide (24mm)
lighter than competitors (137g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Olympus FE-5020
 Olympus E-500Olympus FE-5020
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-500 Olympus FE-5020
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-500 X-935
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2005-10-21 2009-07-22
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 400 1600
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.3-5.8
Macro focus range - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 215 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/500s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.10 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 gr (1.06 lbs) 137 gr (0.30 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card xD-Picture Card, microSD
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $600 $160