Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WG-3 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H10 was revealed 5 years before the WG-3 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-H10 matches up vs the WG-3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Pentax WG-3. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Pentax WG-3
| EX-H10 | WG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Casio EX-H10
| WG-3 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2013 | June 2009 | More modern by 49 months | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Pentax WG-3
| EX-H10 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-H10 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Pentax WG-3 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 versus the WG-3.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and WG-3 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The picture underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and WG-3.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-3 to resolve more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Pentax WG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Pentax |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Pentax WG-3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-06-11 | 2013-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $300 | $300 |