Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GR
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
90 Imaging
58 Features
54 Overall
56
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Renewed by Ricoh GR II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H10 was brought out 4 years earlier than the GR and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-H10 scores against the GR with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Ricoh GR. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Ricoh GR
| EX-H10 | GR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-H10
| GR | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2013 |  | June 2009 | Fresher by 46 months |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh GR
| EX-H10 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-H10 offers outer dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has specifications of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-H10 vs the GR.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and GR is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The visual underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and GR.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-H10 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GR will provide you with greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh GR |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-06-11 | 2013-04-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 300 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $300 | $971 |
