Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV300F
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Launched January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Casio EX-H10 versus Samsung DV300F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and DV300F (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H10 was revealed 3 years before the DV300F which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-H10 scores vs the DV300F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Samsung DV300F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung DV300F
| EX-H10 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Casio EX-H10
| DV300F | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | June 2009 | Newer by 31 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung DV300F
| EX-H10 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 has got exterior measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung DV300F has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H10 versus Samsung DV300F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-H10 versus the DV300F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and DV300F is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specifications. The picture underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and DV300F.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung DV300F to render greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung DV300F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2012-01-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | 133g (0.29 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $300 | $200 |
