Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1L
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
69 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced February 2006
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-H10 versus Samsung GX-1L, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-H10 was unveiled 3 years after the GX-1L which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-H10 matches up versus the GX-1L when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Samsung GX-1L. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung GX-1L
| EX-H10 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2009 |  | February 2006 | Newer by 41 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 210k | Crisper screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Casio EX-H10
| GX-1L | EX-H10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung GX-1L
| EX-H10 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 comes with external dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1L has measurements of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H10 versus Samsung GX-1L in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-H10 versus the GX-1L.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and GX-1L is 93 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and GX-1L.
Clearly, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H10 using its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Casio EX-H10 will offer you more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern EX-H10 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung GX-1L | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung GX-1L |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2006-02-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 7.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 570 grams (1.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $300 | $0 |
