Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1S
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
68 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Launched January 2006
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung GX-1S, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H10 was brought out 3 years later than the GX-1S and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-H10 scores vs the GX-1S in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Samsung GX-1S. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung GX-1S
EX-H10 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2009 | January 2006 | Fresher by 42 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 210k | Clearer screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Casio EX-H10
GX-1S | EX-H10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung GX-1S
EX-H10 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys exterior measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1S has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung GX-1S in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H10 versus the GX-1S.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and GX-1S is 93 and 68 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and GX-1S.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-H10 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Casio EX-H10 will render greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher EX-H10 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung GX-1S |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2006-01-16 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3008 x 2008 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | 605g (1.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-90 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $850 |